mirror of
https://github.com/alrayyes/wiki.git
synced 2024-11-25 13:06:22 +00:00
55 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown
55 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown
|
---
|
||
|
id: 9e3bc9a2-cda1-4097-81ea-6e15736a5e9b
|
||
|
title: Impact of Multifaceted Abstraction on Key Quality Attributes
|
||
|
---
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Understandability
|
||
|
|
||
|
A class with the Multifaceted Abstraction smell has multiple aspects
|
||
|
realized into the abstraction, increasing the cognitive load on the
|
||
|
user. When a class has multiple responsibilities, it takes more time and
|
||
|
effort to understand each responsibility, how they releate to each other
|
||
|
in the abstraction, etc. This adversely affects its understandability.
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Changeability & extensibility
|
||
|
|
||
|
When a class has multiple responsibilities, it is difficult to determine
|
||
|
which members should be modified to support a change or enhancement.
|
||
|
Further, a modification to a member may impact unrelated
|
||
|
responsibilities within the same class; this in turn can have a ripple
|
||
|
effect accross the entire design. For this reason, the amount of time
|
||
|
and effort required to change or extend the class while still ensuring
|
||
|
that the reulting ripple effect has no adverse impact on the correctness
|
||
|
of the software is considerably greater. These factors negatively impact
|
||
|
changeability and extensibility.
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Reusability
|
||
|
|
||
|
Ideally, a well-formed abstraction that supports a single responsibility
|
||
|
has the potential to be reused as a unit in a different context. When an
|
||
|
abstraction has multiple responsibilities, the entire abstraction must
|
||
|
be used even if only one of the responsibilities needs to be reused. In
|
||
|
such a case, the presence of unnecessary responsibilities may become a
|
||
|
costly overhead that must be addressed. Thus, the abstraction's
|
||
|
reusability is compromised. Further, in an abstraction with multiple
|
||
|
responsibilities, sometimes the responsibilities may be intertwined. In
|
||
|
such a case, even if only a single responsibility needs to be reused,
|
||
|
the overall behavior of the abstraction may be unpredicatable, again
|
||
|
affecting its reusability.
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Testability
|
||
|
|
||
|
Often, when a class has multiple responsibilities, these
|
||
|
responsibilities may be tightly coupled to each other, making it
|
||
|
difficult to test each responsibility separately. This can negatively
|
||
|
impact the testability of the class.
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Reliability
|
||
|
|
||
|
The effects of modification to a class with intertwined responsibilities
|
||
|
may be unpredictable and lead to runtime problems. For instance,
|
||
|
consider the case in which each responsibility operates on a seperate
|
||
|
set of variables. When these variables are put together in a single
|
||
|
abstraction, it is easy to mistakenly access the wrong variable,
|
||
|
resulting in a runtime problem.
|